BGonline.org Forums

A better approch?

Posted By: eXtreme Gammon
Date: Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 6:12 p.m.

In Response To: A better approch? (Timothy Chow)

Let me understand exactly what you're saying here. Are you sure that you're going to display the chance that it can be the best, or just the chance that it can be better than the top-scoring play?

Yes I mean the chances that each move has to be the best overall.
It took me a while to find out how to do it.

for instance

is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 102

Money session

pip: 95 score: 0 is Player 1

XGID=-a--ECCbB----B-----bbbbbb-:2:-1:1:14:0:0:0:0:8

to play 14

1.	Rollout1	6/2 5/4	eq: -0.264
	Player: Opponent: 46.11% (G:3.97% B:0.17%) 53.89% (G:14.06% B:0.21%) Conf: ± 0.028 (-0.292...-0.236) Duration: 0.0 second
2.	Rollout1	13/8	eq: -0.275 (-0.011)
	Player: Opponent: 42.03% (G:5.25% B:0.21%) 57.97% (G:6.80% B:0.08%) Conf: ± 0.023 (-0.298...-0.252) Duration: 0.0 second
3.	Rollout1	6/1*	eq: -0.278 (-0.014)
	Player: Opponent: 44.19% (G:7.67% B:0.24%) 55.81% (G:17.30% B:0.23%) Conf: ± 0.023 (-0.301...-0.255) Duration: 0.0 second
4.	1 ply	8/4 6/5	eq: -0.575 (-0.311)
	Player: Opponent: 36.32% (G:3.26% B:0.14%) 63.68% (G:11.77% B:0.11%)
5.	1 ply	8/4 5/4	eq: -0.607 (-0.343)
	Player: Opponent: 35.03% (G:2.86% B:0.12%) 64.97% (G:11.52% B:0.11%)
1 162 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves and cube decisions: 1 ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.10.pre-release

6/2 5/4 has 63.1% chance to the best

13/8 has 22.0%

6/1* has 14.9%

Note the equity and sd are (with more decimals)

e=-0.2641669 s=0.0145117
e=-0.2748757 s=0.0115227
e=-0.2783770 s=0.0119285

It would be great if someone can validate these numbers.. I am pretty sure that's right (again assuming normal and independence). But extra validation never hurts.

thanks,

Xavier

Messages In This Thread

• Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 5:13 p.m.
  • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 5:30 p.m.
  • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
    Tom Keith -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 5:51 p.m.
    • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
      Rich Munitz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:19 a.m.
  • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 7:30 p.m.
    • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:20 p.m.
      • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:31 p.m.
      • Confidence Interval Overlap vs Joint Standard Deviation (long)
        Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 12:21 a.m.
  • A better approch?
    eXtreme Gammon -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 4:02 a.m.
    • A better approch?
      neilkaz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 4:32 a.m.
    • A better approch?
      MaX -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 1:19 p.m.
    • A better approch?
      MaX -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 1:22 p.m.
    • A better approch?
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 5:37 p.m.
      • A better approch?
        eXtreme Gammon -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 6:12 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          Bob Koca -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 7:36 p.m.
          • A better approch?
            Tom Keith -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 8:38 p.m.
            • A better approch?
              Chuck Bower -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:20 a.m.
              • A better approch?
                Jason Lee -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 2:24 a.m.
                • A better approch?
                  Chuck Bower -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 3:06 p.m.
              • A better approch?
                Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 6:56 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          Maik Stiebler -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 10:05 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          MaX -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 10:15 a.m.
          • A better approch?
            Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 6:47 p.m.
            • A better approch?
              MaX -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 8:18 a.m.
          • A better approch?
            eXtreme Gammon -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 7:26 p.m.
            • A better approch?
              MaX -- Thursday, 12 November 2009, at 12:56 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 6:40 p.m.
          • A better approch?
            Tom Keith -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 7:28 p.m.
            • A better approch?
              Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 10:10 p.m.
              • A better approch?
                Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 12:14 a.m.
                • A better approch?
                  Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 1:29 a.m.
                  • A better approch?
                    Maik Stiebler -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 7:18 a.m.
                    • A better approch?
                      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 4:17 p.m.
                      • A better approch?
                        Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 5:23 p.m.
                        • A better approch?
                          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 5:37 p.m.
                          • Aren't you two just particpating in the 250 year old fracas?
                            Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 6:19 p.m.
                            • Aren't you two just particpating in the 250 year old fracas?
                              Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 7:55 p.m.
                              • Aren't you two just particpating in the 250 year old fracas?
                                Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 8:29 p.m.
                            • Aren't you two just particpating in the 250 year old fracas?
                              Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 4 November 2009, at 12:11 p.m.
                      • A better approch?
                        Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 4 November 2009, at 8:40 p.m.
                        • A better approch?
                          Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 4 November 2009, at 10:09 p.m.
                          • A better approch?
                            Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 4 November 2009, at 10:51 p.m.
                            • A better approch?
                              Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 4 November 2009, at 11:57 p.m.
                            • A better approch?
                              Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 6:52 a.m.
                              • A better approch?
                                Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 7:25 a.m.
                                • A better approch?
                                  Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 3:37 p.m.
                                  • A better approch?
                                    Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 9:19 p.m.
                                    • A better approch?
                                      Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 9:42 p.m.
          • A better approch? [LONG]
            MaX -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 3:04 p.m.
            • A better approch? [LONG]
              Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 3:47 p.m.
            • A better approch? [LONG]
              Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 10:01 p.m.
              • A better approch? [LONG]
                MaX -- Friday, 6 November 2009, at 3:31 p.m.
                • A better approch? [LONG]
                  Maik Stiebler -- Saturday, 7 November 2009, at 5:52 p.m.
                  • A better approch? [LONG]
                    MaX -- Monday, 9 November 2009, at 12:39 p.m.
                    • A better approch? [LONG]
                      Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 9 November 2009, at 10:59 p.m.
                      • A better approch? [LONG]
                        MaX -- Tuesday, 10 November 2009, at 1:33 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          Tom Keith -- Thursday, 5 November 2009, at 10:23 p.m.
          • A better approch?
            MaX -- Friday, 6 November 2009, at 12:35 p.m.
    • A better approch?
      Bob Koca -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 7:45 p.m.
      • A better approch?
        eXtreme Gammon -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 10:03 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          Bob Koca -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 10:30 p.m.
    • A better approch?
      Mislav Radica -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 12:59 a.m.
      • A better approch?
        eXtreme Gammon -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:58 a.m.
        • A better approach?
          eXtreme Gammon -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 2:00 a.m.
        • A better approch?
          MaX -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 10:19 a.m.
        • A better approch?
          Mislav Radica -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 12:55 p.m.
          • The different approachs-give us a choice
            Mislav Radica -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:18 p.m.
        • A better approch?
          misja -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 7:36 p.m.
    • A better approch?
      Neil Robins -- Tuesday, 3 November 2009, at 9:39 p.m.