BGonline.org Forums

Backgame theory

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:53 p.m.

In Response To: Backgame theory (Phil Simborg)

Phil Simborg wrote:

Is it possible that in your list you left out a forth component: "probability of getting hit" as another variable in the sentence below?

Yes, you're right...I was sloppily thinking of "probability of getting hit" as being in the same category as "probability of hitting," but you're right that it really belongs in a separate line item.

Messages In This Thread

• Backgame theory
  Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 29 October 2009, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Backgame theory
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 7:16 a.m.
    • Backgame theory
      Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 8:53 a.m.
      • Backgame theory
        Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 10:00 a.m.
  • Backgame theory BOT DATA
    Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 2:58 p.m.
    • Backgame theory BOT DATA
      Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:25 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:36 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        mtuhtan -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:46 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA
        Michael Depreli -- Friday, 30 October 2009, at 4:47 p.m.
    • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
      eXtreme Gammon -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 3:46 a.m.
      • Backgame theory continuation
        Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 12:39 p.m.
        • Backgame theory continuation Correction
          Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 3:36 p.m.
          • Backgame theory continuation Ignore this thread.
            Michael Depreli -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 7:47 p.m.
            • Backgame theory continuation Ignore this thread.
              Frank Berger -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:37 p.m.
        • Backgame theory continuation
          neilkaz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:51 p.m.
          • Backgame theory continuation
            Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 4:08 p.m.
      • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
        Ian Shaw -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 7:35 p.m.
        • Backgame theory BOT DATA: Longer RO
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:38 p.m.
  • Backgame theory
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 1:18 a.m.
    • Backgame theory
      Phil Simborg -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 4:00 a.m.
      • Backgame theory
        Timothy Chow -- Monday, 2 November 2009, at 1:53 p.m.
  • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you? *NM*
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 31 October 2009, at 9:56 p.m.
    • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
      Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 10:07 a.m.
      • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
        neilkaz -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:02 p.m.
        • Did this position come from the last set of 10 I rolled out for you?
          Michael Depreli -- Sunday, 1 November 2009, at 3:41 p.m.