BGonline.org Forums
Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 8:39 p.m.
In Response To: Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games (Marv Porten)
It seems that these bots are quite good when it comes to not missing cubes as the error totals are small. I'd not be at all concerned with comparisons of close small numbers like .224 vs .209 or .399 vs .362 and would wait for more data or larger differences to make my judgements.
Messages In This Thread
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Michael Depreli -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 12:47 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 2:13 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
mtuhtan -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 3:44 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Marv Porten -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 7:49 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 8:39 p.m.
- Hypothesis
Marv Porten -- Thursday, 12 November 2009, at 12:50 a.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 8:41 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 9:23 p.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Dan Pelton -- Thursday, 12 November 2009, at 3:33 a.m.
- Bot Comparison 100 / 500 games
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 12 November 2009, at 9:10 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.