BGonline.org Forums

Request of Play65 Board of Trustees

Posted By: Michael Petch
Date: Wednesday, 2 December 2009, at 4:49 p.m.

In Response To: Request of Play65 Board of Trustees (Stick)

Thanks Stick,

I stand corrected. I knew you had discussed him but wasn't aware he wasn't a candidate. So many messages on the subject I lost track.

My issue isn't that you changed your mind at all (regarding PJT in general), and a lot of my questions have more to do with how information gets moved around etc (the who and why). I may have chosen a different path though with regards to making a claim public without being willing to disclose evidence. That is liekly more of a philisophical difference than anything else.

There are a lot of things wrong with this whole situation (even more so when I look at Play 65's response today). I am now scratching my head. It is very difficult for me to draw any conclusion with all the contradictory information here.

Thanks, Michael

Messages In This Thread

• Request of Play65 Board of Trustees
  Michael Petch -- Tuesday, 1 December 2009, at 11:14 p.m.
  • Request of Play65 Board of Trustees
    Stick -- Wednesday, 2 December 2009, at 2:59 p.m.
    • Request of Play65 Board of Trustees
      Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 2 December 2009, at 4:49 p.m.