[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

2 checkers back vs. 1 checker back against a superbackgame

Posted By: Rich Munitz
Date: Friday, 11 December 2009, at 3:42 a.m.

In Response To: 2 checkers back vs. 1 checker back against a superbackgame (Nack Ballard)

I think we are in agreement. It is indeed a tradeoff. But I stand by my general concept that by anchoring you get all the benefit of the anchor at the prime's edge and at the same time retain a substantial portion of the benefits of leaping. It was indeed a simplification of the situation, but one which I think is useful in helping people frame what is going on here. I think the rule of thumb applies here that if you have a choice between a play that does two good things, it is usually better than a play that does one good thing.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.