BGonline.org Forums

Bot backgame comparison Redux

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 14 December 2009, at 10:51 p.m.

In Response To: Bot backgame comparison Redux (Michael Depreli)

Michael Depreli wrote:

I think we can get closer to the truth i.e. show that some plays are definitely not correct

Yes, I agree. You've created a very "clean" position where a lot of relevant calculations can be done "by hand"—probability of getting hit, probability of dancing, expected dancing time, etc. It's still a lot of work to analyze the position, but it should be doable if we were motivated enough to carry it out.

Messages In This Thread

• Bot backgame comparison Redux
  Michael Depreli -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 3:38 p.m.
  • Bot backgame comparison Redux
    Dan Pelton -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 4:30 p.m.
    • Bot backgame GNU 41 Should Be 12/8 6/5 (No Hit) Typo
      Michael Depreli -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 4:34 p.m.
  • Bot backgame comparison Redux
    Phil Simborg -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 7:10 p.m.
    • Bot backgame comparison Redux
      Michael Depreli -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 8:25 p.m.
      • Bot backgame comparison Redux
        Timothy Chow -- Monday, 14 December 2009, at 10:51 p.m.
  • Bot backgame comparison Redux
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 December 2009, at 2:14 a.m.
  • Bot backgame comparison Redux
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 17 December 2009, at 3:18 a.m.
    • Bot backgame comparison Redux
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 17 December 2009, at 3:42 a.m.
      • Bot backgame comparison Redux
        Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 3:45 a.m.