| |
BGonline.org Forums
New GV article
Posted By: Timothy Chow In Response To: New GV article (Bob Koca)
Date: Thursday, 17 December 2009, at 9:42 p.m.
I am not seeing the problem with the transposition, is it possible to give a simplified example to show how it is a problem?
It will take more time than I'm willing to put in right now to construct a fully worked-out example, but the idea is this. Suppose that from a given position of interest, the sequence of rolls 43-65-41 produces a position P1 that happens to be identical to the position P2 that arises from the sequence of rolls 41-65-43 (when the rolls are played using whatever ply-level you've chosen for the rollout). Then Var[equity(P1) + equity(P2)] will not be equal to Var[equity(P1)] + Var[equity(P2)]; it will be twice that, because equity(P1) and equity(P2) are really the same random variable.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.