BGonline.org Forums

Initial look at 51S 62 at GG with XG 4 ply RO

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 5:14 a.m.

In Response To: Initial look at 51S 62 at GG with XG 4 ply RO (neilkaz)

I have the GNU version of this running. Since we are traveling, I won't see the results for a few days. When I left, after a little less than 2k, $ (13-5) was best. H (13-11, 8-2*) was second about .010 back. R and S were off by more than .020 with JSD that were high enough that I would normally take them out of the rollout, eliminating them from consideration.

Since my rollout has a long way to go, it might change to align itself with this one. But, it is also possible that we have a case where GNU disagrees with another bot by quite a bit.

I have some doubts about GNU's evaluation of slotting plays like this and I suspect that XG's rollouts may be better. But, I also want to ask, are we sure that XG plays the checkers properly ATS rather than using the Snowie approach?

Messages In This Thread

• Initial look at 51S 62 at GG with XG 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 3:29 a.m.
  • Initial look at 51S 62 at GG with XG 4 ply RO
    David Rockwell -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 5:14 a.m.