| |
BGonline.org Forums
Double action in 2-4-5 backgame
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: Double action in 2-4-5 backgame (Rich Munitz)
Date: Wednesday, 13 January 2010, at 5:35 a.m.
Oops, looks like 56 is not a double shot as I first thought it was.
Yet, I'm still feeling that technically speaking it will still be a double. It almost seems like a 2-away 2-away kind of situation. The point will invariably come where it is right to turn the cube, or we'll get gammoned and lose the match anyway, so turn it now since there is a big market losing sequence.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.