BGonline.org Forums

Selection-biased 64

Posted By: Rich Munitz
Date: Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 7:41 p.m.

In Response To: Selection-biased 64 (Matt Cohn-Geier)

I really like making the bar point here. Its not like there is much in the way of a racing lead to run, and the blot gets hit back way too often. Making the 2 point is lame, strips everything and is hard to follow up. Prime two men back, attack a lone checker. And if white does not anchor, then attacking will be much stronger with the prime in place. Note that after anchoring with the 2, white will be hard pressed to play the other die effectively.

7(2)

Messages In This Thread

• Selection-biased 64
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 11:34 a.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 12:37 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 4:01 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 4:58 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 6:18 p.m.
    • Selection-biased 64
      Sam Pottle -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 1:32 a.m.
      • Whew!
        Chuck Bower -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 2:18 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 7:41 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 2:27 p.m.
    • Selection-biased 64
      Stick -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 7:33 p.m.