BGonline.org Forums

Long Nactation sequences -- format options

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 5:29 a.m.

In Response To: Money game double 3's (Rich Munitz)

I'm not sure if you noticed the suggestion I had made buried deep down in some old thread. But I still prefer alternating dashes and underscores to everything I've seen so far. I think it is the most readable and does not require any special HTML notations.

Ah, yes, I had a feeling I was leaving something out. Sorry about that. I consider your choice quite viable. I've repeated the list and added it as (h) below.

(a) 63S-65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P-33

(b) 63S-65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P-33

(c) 63S-65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P-33

(d) 63S-65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P-33

(e) -63S+65K-61H+61P-21U+31P-63P+33

(f) -63S+65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P-33

(g) -63S+65K-61H-61P-21U-31P-63P+33

(h) 63S-65K_61H-61P_21U-31P_63P-33

(Btw, somebody else suggested spaces where the underscores of (h) are, but that format is the same as my format for a series of two roll sequences, so I didn't include that as an option.)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Money game double 3's
  Timothy Chow -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 1:15 a.m.
  • Money game double 3's
    TheProdigy -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 1:53 a.m.
    • Money game double 3's
      Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 2:42 a.m.
  • Money game double 3's
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 4:19 p.m.
    • Money game double 3's
      Stick -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 4:13 a.m.
    • Money game double 3's
      Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 4:36 a.m.
      • Long Nactation sequences -- format options
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 5:29 a.m.
  • Money game double 3's
    neilkaz -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 4:29 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 11:52 p.m.