BGonline.org Forums

OT: poker hypothetical

Posted By: David
Date: Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:55 a.m.

In Response To: OT: poker hypothetical (Chuck Bower)

Seems like KK is better by a mile.

If I have QQ I'm a HUGE underdog to 2/3 of his possible hands.

If I have KK I'm trailing his AA but beating his AK, so I'm close to even money.

Having KK means he's more likely to have the AA hand, but I don't think that compensates.

Messages In This Thread

• OT: poker hypothetical
  Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:38 a.m.
  • OT: poker hypothetical
    Stick -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:41 a.m.
    • OT: poker hypothetical
      Stick -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:47 a.m.
    • OT: poker hypothetical
      Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 3:14 a.m.
      • OT: poker hypothetical
        Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 4:59 a.m.
  • OT: poker hypothetical
    David -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:55 a.m.
    • OT: poker hypothetical
      Stick -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 3:08 a.m.
    • OT: poker hypothetical
      Sam Pottle -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 2:11 p.m.
  • OT: poker hypothetical
    Chiva Tafazzoli -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 11:00 a.m.
  • OT: poker hypothetical
    misja -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 12:30 p.m.
  • My take, and the quote from the book
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:07 a.m.
    • Stick?? Does the emperor have clothes?
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:14 p.m.
      • Stick?? Does the emperor have clothes?
        Stick -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:49 p.m.
      • Stick?? Does the emperor have clothes?
        Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:24 p.m.
        • Stick?? Does the emperor have clothes?
          Stick -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
          • Stick?? Does the emperor have clothes?
            Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:04 p.m.