BGonline.org Forums
Why a 1 ply RO?
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Friday, 5 February 2010, at 7:41 p.m.
In Response To: Ballard-Grandell position - similar concept (Leonardo Jerkovic)
I strongly suspect that the equity for not cubing is too high and that 1 ply is taking some passes later. This position if it really rolls out as a .952 take should be a clear double.
Messages In This Thread
- New Mexico Finals - John O'Hagan v. Dorn Bishop
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:59 p.m.
- New Mexico Finals - John O'Hagan v. Dorn Bishop
Marv Porten -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:08 p.m.
- New Mexico Finals - John O'Hagan v. Dorn Bishop
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:29 p.m.
- New Mexico Finals - John O'Hagan v. Dorn Bishop
John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:49 p.m.
- New Mexico Finals - John O'Hagan v. Dorn Bishop
Dorn Bishop -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:56 p.m.
- Ballard-Grandell position - similar concept
Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:46 a.m.
- Why a 1 ply RO?
neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 7:41 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.