BGonline.org Forums

Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted

Posted By: Marv Porten
Date: Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 12:55 a.m.

In Response To: Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted (Timothy Chow)

Tim - I'm not singling you out; I'm just using your posting to re-raise something that I requested a few weeks ago.

It really would be helpful if people who analyze problems also indicated how long it took them to reach their conclusion, and how much time should be spent on the problem if it came up over-the-board. Although dozens (maybe hundreds) of analyses have been posted since I first made my request, I haven't seen one that includes information about "thinking time."

Messages In This Thread

• Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
  Timothy Chow -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 11:09 p.m.
  • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
    Marv Porten -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 12:55 a.m.
    • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 1:10 a.m.
      • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
        Marv Porten -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 1:25 a.m.
        • Clock usage guidelines
          Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 11:55 p.m.
          • Clock usage guidelines
            Marv Porten -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 2:47 a.m.
            • Clock usage guidelines
              Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 5:01 a.m.
  • 5 ply/4 ply XG RO
    Stick -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 3:51 a.m.
  • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
    christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 9:52 a.m.