BGonline.org Forums

Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted

Posted By: Marv Porten
Date: Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 1:25 a.m.

In Response To: Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted (Timothy Chow)

Tim: I'm afraid I'm just not that interested in clocking myself just for your benefit.

Marv: Tim, I think you've misunderstood my general request, which (as I mentioned) wasn't intended to single you out. First of all, if it were indeed "just for [my] benefit" I wouldn't make the request. I'm assuming that the information would be helpful to many people. If my assumption is not correct, then, of course, I withdraw my request. Second, I didn't expect people to rush out and buy a stopwatch in order to report that they spent 36.75 seconds on a problem. A ballpark estimate is all that's needed. For example, "I spent about a minute on this because of QF, but OTB I'd give it no more than 30 seconds."

Messages In This Thread

• Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
  Timothy Chow -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 11:09 p.m.
  • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
    Marv Porten -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 12:55 a.m.
    • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 1:10 a.m.
      • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
        Marv Porten -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 1:25 a.m.
        • Clock usage guidelines
          Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 11:55 p.m.
          • Clock usage guidelines
            Marv Porten -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 2:47 a.m.
            • Clock usage guidelines
              Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 5:01 a.m.
  • 5 ply/4 ply XG RO
    Stick -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 3:51 a.m.
  • Revisiting a position that Christian Munk-Christensen posted
    christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 9:52 a.m.