BGonline.org Forums

Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?

Posted By: Steve Mellen
Date: Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 5:28 a.m.

In Response To: Do I set up 55? What could be more simple? (Nack Ballard)

I wrote down all my calculations, but it's on a piece of scrap paper on my desk at work, so I think the mystery may remain unsolved until Monday :)

Off the top of my head, if you have the 6222 position and roll 65 64 63 62, you get off with 26 numbers next roll, not 25, right?

Messages In This Thread

• Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
  neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 8:31 p.m.
  • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
    Stick -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 8:37 p.m.
    • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 10:14 p.m.
  • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
    Bob Koca -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 9:33 p.m.
    • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
      Steve Mellen -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 11:00 p.m.
  • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
    Steve Mellen -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 10:49 p.m.
    • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 4:02 a.m.
      • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
        Steve Mellen -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 5:28 a.m.
        • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 5:39 a.m.
          • Postscript
            Steve Mellen -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 6:20 p.m.
            • Postscript
              Bob Koca -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 8:49 p.m.
            • Postscript
              Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 7:24 a.m.
      • Do I set up 55? What could be more simple?
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 9:36 a.m.
  • OTB etc
    neilkaz -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 8:56 p.m.