[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

RO of your 38-43 position

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 9:19 p.m.

In Response To: RO of your 38-43 position (neilkaz)

Neil gives a good example of a maximally efficient position for both sides that results in a miniscule take one pip deeper than predicted by the table. However, it only takes a small amount of wastage to push into pass territory.

The optimal bearoff with 38 pips (on the left) wastes 6.51. White's position on the right wastes 6.85 pips - a difference of 0.34 pips. This certainly can be classed as an "efficient position", and fits in with the table.

I think this illustrates my contention that the table is intended to apply to low-wastage positions in general. (As with all generalizations, there are exceptions.)

gnubg43


 ' ' '1X3X4X ' ' ' ' ' '

 ' ' '1O2O4O ' ' ' ' ' '

ian38

Position ID: 6B4AANAeAAAAAA Match ID: cAkAAAAAAAAA

Cube decision
0-ply cubeless equity +0.5485
0.7743 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.2257 0.0000 0.0000
Cubeful equities:
1.Double, take +0.9944
2.Double, pass +1.0000 +0.0056
3.No double +0.8056 -0.1888
Proper cube action:Double, take

gnubg43


 ' '1X '2X5X ' ' ' ' ' '

 ' ' '1O2O4O ' ' ' ' ' '

ian38

Position ID: ZB8AANAeAAAAAA Match ID: cAkOAAAAAAAA

Cube decision
2-ply cubeless equity +0.5728
0.7864 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.2136 0.0000 0.0000
Cubeful equities:
1.Double, pass +1.0000
2.Double, take +1.0522 +0.0522
3.No double +0.8344 -0.1656
Proper cube action:Double, pass

The results here are from the gnubg two-sided database (the 0- or 2-ply distinction is false). I don't see any need for a rollout when we have pre-computed precise data available.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.