| |
BGonline.org Forums
The opposite of a market loser
Posted By: David Rockwell In Response To: The opposite of a market loser (Timothy Chow)
Date: Monday, 8 February 2010, at 4:38 p.m.
I have called these "reversals". This term has not caught on and I am not stuck on it. I don't particularly like the term anti-market losers since it doesn't describe what is happening. Conceptually, you are losing your double / You have suffered a reversal. The loss part of the equation from doubling is equal to the mistake you would make if you refrained from doubling now and then doubled inappropriately after the next two roll sequence. The gain from doubling is equal to the mistake your opponent would make if you refrained from doubling now and then were taken inappropriately after the next two roll sequence; market losers. All sequences which are double / take after the next two roll sequence have no baring on the doubling decision whether equity has changed or not. If total gains (market losers) are greater than total losses (reversals), double. Otherwise, don't double.
And, you are right, most players aren't conciously aware of the reversal part of the equation. Discussion is almost always focused exclusively on market losers, or even worse, the doubling window.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.