[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

The opposite of a market loser

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 3:07 a.m.

In Response To: The opposite of a market loser (Bob Koca)

Bob Koca wrote:

Note that a sequence being an anti-market loser as you define it is not equivalent with no longer being in the doubling window. Should there be a distinct term for such a sequence?

I'm not sure exactly what you're getting at. Are you saying I didn't phrase my definition quite correctly? Tacitly, I'm using the terms "market loser" and "market freezer" only if it's currently correct for my opponent to take. Assume I don't double now. A market loser is a pair of rolls such that next turn my opponent should drop. A market freezer is a pair of rolls such that next turn I should not double.

Maybe you're worried about cases where next turn I'm too good, so that something can be both a market loser and a market freezer? I'm not so worried about making sure the terminology is perfect in every conceivable scenario. I think the way I've defined the terms here is good enough for most situations. (Though now that I think about it, it strikes me that this may be another argument for "market freezer" over, say, "lemon"; we're supposed to be measuring what we might gain by not doubling, and sometimes we gain not because things next turn are sour but because things next turn are extremely sweet. "Freezing" indicates only that I'm unwilling to sell and doesn't indicate why.)

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.