BGonline.org Forums

The opposite of a market loser

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 4:21 p.m.

In Response To: The opposite of a market loser (Fabrice Liardet)

Nice observation, Fabrice.

As I said elsewhere, the "market loser/freezer" terminology is designed with the assumption that my opponent currently has a take. Then market losers measure what I gain by doubling, and market freezers measure what I lose by doubling.

If my opponent doesn't have a take, then we can similarly ask what I gain by doubling, and what I lose by doubling. I don't think "anti-loser" is a good term, period (though "anti-freezer" is kind of amusing). For the situation you describe (my opponent has a take next turn), I would propose "market maker." And for the companion concept, I think we could reuse the term "market freezer," because it's still a case of "no double" being correct next turn. So:

If my opponent has a take, market losers measure the gain from doubling, and market freezers measure the loss from doubling.

If my opponent has a drop, market makers measure the gain from doubling, and market freezers measure the loss from doubling.

Messages In This Thread

• The opposite of a market loser
  Timothy Chow -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 3:46 p.m.
  • The opposite of a market loser
    David Rockwell -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 4:38 p.m.
    • The opposite of a market loser
      Ray Kershaw -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 4:50 p.m.
      • The opposite of a market loser
        David Rockwell -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 4:55 p.m.
        • The opposite of a market loser
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 6:39 p.m.
          • The opposite of a market loser
            Bob Koca -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 6:42 p.m.
          • The opposite of a market loser
            Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 3:51 p.m.
            • The opposite of a market loser
              Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 4:22 p.m.
              • The opposite of a market loser
                David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 4:47 p.m.
                • The opposite of a market loser
                  Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 7:03 p.m.
                  • The opposite of a market loser
                    Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 10 February 2010, at 12:52 a.m.
  • The opposite of a market loser
    Phil Simborg -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 5:11 p.m.
  • The opposite of a market loser
    Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 10:58 p.m.
    • The opposite of a market loser
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 11:24 p.m.
      • The opposite of a market loser
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 1:03 a.m.
        • The opposite of a market loser
          Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 5:34 p.m.
          • The opposite of a market loser
            Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 9:46 p.m.
            • The opposite of a market loser
              Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
              • The opposite of a market loser
                Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 11:57 p.m.
                • The opposite of a market loser
                  Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 10 February 2010, at 12:23 a.m.
    • The opposite of a market loser
      Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 3:42 a.m.
  • The opposite of a market loser
    Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 1:40 a.m.
    • The opposite of a market loser
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 3:07 a.m.
      • The opposite of a market loser
        Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 3:38 a.m.
        • The opposite of a market loser
          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 4:07 a.m.
  • The opposite of a market loser
    Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 9:12 a.m.
    • The opposite of a market loser
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 4:21 p.m.
      • The opposite of a market loser
        Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 8:17 p.m.