BGonline.org Forums

Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG?

Posted By: Stick
Date: Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 3:53 p.m.

In Response To: Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG? (jdg)

I don't think there is a correlation. I also think it depends largely on the type of plays you're comparing.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• 42P-43 update
  neilkaz -- Friday, 12 February 2010, at 7:34 p.m.
  • 42P-43 At Match Scores
    Paul Weaver -- Friday, 12 February 2010, at 10:31 p.m.
    • 42P-43 At Match Scores
      Stick -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 6:32 a.m.
      • Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG?
        jdg -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 2:17 p.m.
        • Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG?
          Stick -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 3:53 p.m.
        • Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG?
          Rich Munitz -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 7:20 p.m.
          • Weaker vs. Stronger ~ GS vs. GG?
            jdg -- Sunday, 14 February 2010, at 1:54 p.m.
    • Are we sure weaker vs stronger matters here?
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 4:36 p.m.
      • Are we sure weaker vs stronger matters here?
        Stick -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 4:46 p.m.
        • Are we sure weaker vs stronger matters here?
          David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 5:36 p.m.
  • 42P-43: more data
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 3:07 a.m.
    • 42P-43: more data
      Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 13 February 2010, at 6:04 p.m.
      • 42P-43: more data
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 14 February 2010, at 2:13 a.m.
        • 42P-43: more data
          Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 14 February 2010, at 5:23 p.m.
          • 42P-43: more data
            Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 14 February 2010, at 7:46 p.m.
            • 42P-43: more data
              Chuck Bower -- Monday, 15 February 2010, at 8:47 p.m.
              • 42P-43: more data
                Nack Ballard -- Monday, 15 February 2010, at 11:51 p.m.
        • 42P-43: more data
          Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 14 February 2010, at 5:49 p.m.