BGonline.org Forums

64P-64P-54 at this score

Posted By: David
Date: Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 3:11 a.m.

In Response To: 64P-64P-54 at this score (neilkaz)

Regarding the 5-4 play, from what I understand when your opponent opens with 64P, you tend to NOT split your back checkers as that just lets him execute his main game plan: attack.

Could 13-4 be right?

Messages In This Thread

• 64P-64P-54 at this score
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 2:33 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Stick -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 2:54 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    David -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 3:11 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 3:36 a.m.
    • 64P-64P-54 at this score
      Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 8:43 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 6:19 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    garyo -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 8:55 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Martin -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 11:36 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 7:02 p.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 3:40 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 long $$ RO
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 4:56 p.m.
    • 64P-64P-54 long $$ RO
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 11:55 p.m.
  • Thoughts OTB
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 5:18 p.m.
  • RO's at score
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 5:32 p.m.