BGonline.org Forums

64P-64P-54 at this score

Posted By: garyo
Date: Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 8:55 a.m.

In Response To: 64P-64P-54 at this score (neilkaz)

64p-64? i can understand p, r, and s (in that order) p - equalizes position and awaits development, r is trying to race. split is a bit further away, but still in the realm of imagination.

after 64p-64p-54? it looks like s, d, and r the best candidates. i like split --- if you're hit, you lose less ground than with the others you are balancing offense and defense, and it makes your opponent want to split to equalize (less he get primed) which is what you want --- a gammonish cube in the offing.

Messages In This Thread

• 64P-64P-54 at this score
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 2:33 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Stick -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 2:54 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    David -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 3:11 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 3:36 a.m.
    • 64P-64P-54 at this score
      Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 8:43 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 6:19 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    garyo -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 8:55 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Martin -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 11:36 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 16 February 2010, at 7:02 p.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 at this score
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 3:40 a.m.
  • 64P-64P-54 long $$ RO
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 4:56 p.m.
    • 64P-64P-54 long $$ RO
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 11:55 p.m.
  • Thoughts OTB
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 5:18 p.m.
  • RO's at score
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 17 February 2010, at 5:32 p.m.