BGonline.org Forums

Battle of the anchors

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Saturday, 27 February 2010, at 11:44 p.m.

In Response To: Battle of the anchors (Stick)

One of the best ways to understand a position, rather than a move choice, is to look at all 21 rolls to see if they follow a common theme or not. Breaking the back anchor with a 32 isn't legal. So, to test Stick's general response, we can look at moves such as 52 where running from the back is a choice. If 8-3*, 6-4 is still right, then that supports his ideas. And, I suspect he is.

Messages In This Thread

• Battle of the anchors
  Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 27 February 2010, at 10:46 p.m.
  • Battle of the anchors
    Chase -- Saturday, 27 February 2010, at 11:08 p.m.
  • Battle of the anchors
    Stick -- Saturday, 27 February 2010, at 11:11 p.m.
    • Battle of the anchors
      David Rockwell -- Saturday, 27 February 2010, at 11:44 p.m.
      • Battle of the anchors
        Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 28 February 2010, at 12:25 a.m.
      • Battle of the anchors
        johnk -- Monday, 1 March 2010, at 1:53 a.m.
  • Battle of the anchors
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 28 February 2010, at 3:49 p.m.
  • Rollout: Battle of the anchors
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 1 March 2010, at 3:28 a.m.
    • Editing screwup
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 1 March 2010, at 3:53 a.m.