BGonline.org Forums
Cube ruling #2
Posted By: Gregg Cattanach
Date: Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
In Response To: Cube ruling #2 (Tom Keith)
You are ignoring the last part of the rule:
"verbal or physical acts may be interpreted as cube actions."
Messages In This Thread
- Cube ruling #2
Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:39 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:46 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
David -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:54 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Jason Lee -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 6:04 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:58 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Bob Glass -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 10:45 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:09 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:27 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:09 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:39 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 12:05 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.