BGonline.org Forums
Cube ruling #2
Posted By: Barry Silliman
Date: Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 3:18 p.m.
In Response To: Cube ruling #2 (Gregg Cattanach)
The ambiguity to me is that it is not clear if this means the interpretation is on the part of the opponent or on the part of the director in the event that a ruling is sought.
Messages In This Thread
- Cube ruling #2
Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:39 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:46 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
David -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:54 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Jason Lee -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 6:04 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:58 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Bob Glass -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 10:45 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:09 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:27 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:09 a.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 3:18 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:39 p.m.
- Cube ruling #2
Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 12:05 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.