BGonline.org Forums

Confusion about "2-point"

Posted By: Stick
Date: Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:37 p.m.

In Response To: Confusion about "2-point" (Timothy Chow)

The confusion is my fault. I skimmed Chase's original post and caught the anchoring up play and not what he said he'd "obviously" play. 3/2 might not be bad, I think 24/23 would make me hurl.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Which one?
  John Little -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 5:07 p.m.
  • Which one?
    Chase -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 6:18 p.m.
    • Which one?
      Stick -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 6:33 p.m.
      • Which one?
        Chase -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 6:49 p.m.
  • Which one?
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 7:46 p.m.
    • Which one?
      Stick -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 7:55 p.m.
      • Which one?
        John Little -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:25 p.m.
        • Confusion about "2-point"
          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:33 p.m.
          • Confusion about "2-point"
            John Little -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:36 p.m.
          • Confusion about "2-point"
            Stick -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:37 p.m.
          • Confusion about "2-point"
            Chase -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 9:45 p.m.
            • Thanks, Chase
              John Little -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 10:10 p.m.
              • Thanks, Chase
                Stick -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 10:13 p.m.
              • Thanks, Chase
                Chase -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 10:21 p.m.
                • Thanks, Chase
                  Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 10:40 p.m.
              • Thanks, Chase
                Neil Robins -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 11:38 p.m.
                • Thanks, Chase
                  Stick -- Tuesday, 9 March 2010, at 11:45 p.m.
                  • Thanks, Chase
                    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 12:10 a.m.
                    • Thanks, Chase
                      Neil Robins -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 10:50 a.m.
                • Thanks, Chase
                  Gregg Cattanach -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 1:43 p.m.
                  • Thanks, Chase
                    Chase -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 2:34 p.m.
                    • Thanks, Chase
                      Gregg Cattanach -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 4:25 p.m.
                      • Thanks, Chase
                        Chase -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 7:25 p.m.
                        • Thanks, Chase
                          Gregg Cattanach -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 8:09 p.m.
                    • Thanks, Chase
                      Stick -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 6:42 p.m.
                      • Thanks, Chase
                        Chase -- Wednesday, 10 March 2010, at 7:26 p.m.