| |
BGonline.org Forums
43S-22N_65R-43? - Rollout
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: 43S-22N_65R-43? (Rich Munitz)
Date: Wednesday, 17 March 2010, at 6:31 p.m.
Not statsig, but close enough for me. I'm not wasting any more time on this clunker of a machine.
OTB I hit, reasoning that I was behind in the race and desperately needed a tempo play given the array of builders on the other side, and that attacking the lone checker was thematic. But bold vs. safe criteria is clearly on the side of bold here, and the action play of 24/20 provokes a fight from a position of strength with less to lose, while the slot creates other potential; there is an excellent chance of winning the battle on one of the two fronts.
is Player 2
score: 2
pip: 149![]()
![]()
5 point match pip: 159
score: 3
is Player 1
XGID=-a--B-C-C--BdC-aac-e----B-:0:0:1:43:3:2:0:5:10 to play 43
1. Rollout1 24/20 8/5 eq: -0.184
Player:
Opponent:50.72% (G:15.70% B:1.95%)
49.28% (G:15.14% B:2.33%)Conf: ± 0.009 (-0.193...-0.175)
Duration: 10 hours 36 minutes2. Rollout1 13/9 8/5 eq: -0.194 (-0.010)
Player:
Opponent:50.32% (G:17.47% B:2.40%)
49.68% (G:15.30% B:3.26%)Conf: ± 0.009 (-0.203...-0.185)
Duration: 13 hours 04 minutes3. Rollout1 8/1* eq: -0.194 (-0.011)
Player:
Opponent:49.50% (G:19.22% B:2.98%)
50.50% (G:14.54% B:3.06%)Conf: ± 0.009 (-0.203...-0.185)
Duration: 12 hours 06 minutes1 7776 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 3 plyeXtreme Gammon Version: 1.13, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.