| |
BGonline.org Forums
The 32 backgame seems to have worked
Posted By: John O'Hagan In Response To: The 32 backgame seems to have worked (neilkaz)
Date: Monday, 22 March 2010, at 5:47 a.m.
This is a tough position to analyze. 20 hits, 9 of which cover. The 16 non-hits mostly play alright since they give you at least a much-better-than-normal deucepoint game and even if you roll your worst (D4 or D5), brunette shouldn't redouble. Brunette's 3 dead checkers on the ace are a real liability. I think it's a take but I think there's enough volatility to spin it. Woolsey's rule also sez to double. Lots of people will pass, maybe correctly. It's a tough position to analyze so double and let the oppt decide.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.