[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

The 32 backgame seems to have worked

Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Monday, 22 March 2010, at 5:47 a.m.

In Response To: The 32 backgame seems to have worked (neilkaz)

This is a tough position to analyze. 20 hits, 9 of which cover. The 16 non-hits mostly play alright since they give you at least a much-better-than-normal deucepoint game and even if you roll your worst (D4 or D5), brunette shouldn't redouble. Brunette's 3 dead checkers on the ace are a real liability. I think it's a take but I think there's enough volatility to spin it. Woolsey's rule also sez to double. Lots of people will pass, maybe correctly. It's a tough position to analyze so double and let the oppt decide.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.