BGonline.org Forums

Kit's source data

Posted By: Rich Munitz
Date: Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 5:22 a.m.

In Response To: Kit's source data (mfic)

"There was NOT an assumed Gammon Rate but rather a GR extracted from the matches themselves. E.G. how many actual times a Gammon occurred at the different scores of during those 1100 matches."

I'm not exactly sure how to do this. When a game is claimed with the cube and not played out to the end, how is it determined whether the game would have resulted in a gammon or not? And is it reasonable to assume that if they only considered games that were played out to the end, that they were representative of all games?

Messages In This Thread

• Rockwell/Kazaross versus Woolsey
  Ray Kershaw -- Saturday, 27 March 2010, at 10:28 a.m.
  • Rockwell/Kazaross versus Woolsey
    Phil Simborg -- Saturday, 27 March 2010, at 11:55 a.m.
  • Kit's source data
    mfic -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 2:52 a.m.
    • Kit's source data
      Rich Munitz -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 5:22 a.m.
      • Kit's source data
        Chase -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 5:56 a.m.
        • date, reference, more info
          Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 1:39 p.m.
      • Kit's source data
        Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 2:32 p.m.
        • Kit's source data
          Tom Keith -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 4:13 p.m.
          • Kit's source data
            Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 28 March 2010, at 5:20 p.m.