"I would be sorely tempted to play H against anyone who opened with 21U and damn the rollouts which I know will play P." - Stick
So the 21 Up gambit immediately draws a 0.07 error from the #7 Giant. Result!
Seriously though, why do you think hitting is perhaps the better play? I assume you believe that White's opening indicates that they are a worse player than you. But how much equity can you hope to gain from a sub-standard hitting play, considering that you instantly concede some? By exposing the blots you immediately simplify White's choices, don't you?
The score (after 0 games) is: White 0, Blue 0 (match to 7 points)
Move number 2: Blue to play 46
| White | 164 |
|---|---|
| |
| Blue | 167 |
Position ID: 4HPwASLgc/ABMA Match ID: cAn6AAAAAAAA | |
• Blue moves 13/7 8/4*
Alert: doubtful move ( -0.073)
| # | Ply | Move | Equity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 8/2 6/2 | -0.074 | |
| 0.479 0.133 0.004 - 0.521 0.141 0.005 | ||||
| 2 | 2 | 24/14 | -0.097 ( -0.023) | |
| 0.483 0.101 0.003 - 0.517 0.137 0.003 | ||||
| 3 | 2 | 24/20 13/7 | -0.120 ( -0.046) | |
| 0.468 0.119 0.004 - 0.532 0.134 0.005 | ||||
| • | 7 | 2 | 13/7 8/4* | -0.147 ( -0.073) |
| 0.466 0.130 0.005 - 0.534 0.161 0.010 | ||||