BGonline.org Forums

Here's why 31P-65R-31N but 31P-65R-41E

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Saturday, 1 May 2010, at 6:40 a.m.

In Response To: Here's why 31P-65R-31N but 31P-65R-41E (Nack Ballard)

Nack, many thanks for providing all this information and the explanations.

When I typed up about the impact of the made 5-point on 54, I knew I should also be looking at 44, but figured the swing would be not as large, and happen less often, so I ignored it. The quantification of both effects is interesting, and I learned something about the position and about analytical methods. Thanks!

Messages In This Thread

• 31P-65R-xx
  mtuhtan -- Wednesday, 28 April 2010, at 5:55 a.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    mtuhtan -- Wednesday, 28 April 2010, at 6:46 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Martin -- Wednesday, 28 April 2010, at 7:37 p.m.
    • 31P-65R-xx
      Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 29 April 2010, at 7:24 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 28 April 2010, at 8:20 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 29 April 2010, at 8:04 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-xx
    Bob Koca -- Friday, 30 April 2010, at 6:28 a.m.
  • 31P-65R-31 - Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 30 April 2010, at 2:13 p.m.
    • 31P-65R-31 - Rollout
      Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 30 April 2010, at 2:24 p.m.
      • Here's why 31P-65R-31N but 31P-65R-41E
        Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 1 May 2010, at 2:39 a.m.
        • Here's why 31P-65R-31N but 31P-65R-41E
          Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 1 May 2010, at 6:40 a.m.
  • 31P-65R-41 - Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 30 April 2010, at 2:15 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-43 - Rollout
    mtuhtan -- Friday, 30 April 2010, at 2:16 p.m.