BGonline.org Forums

Win without hitting (smallest chance)

Posted By: Ray Kershaw
Date: Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:45 p.m.

In Response To: Win without hitting (smallest chance) (Nack Ballard)

Please would you clarify the question. White must be off in 6 rolls. Blue requires 75 cross overs. How can Blue possibly win without hitting ?

Messages In This Thread

• Win without hitting (smallest chance)
  Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:20 p.m.
  • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:33 p.m.
    • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:47 p.m.
  • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
    Ray Kershaw -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:45 p.m.
    • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:48 p.m.
      • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
        Ray Kershaw -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 5:58 p.m.
        • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
          Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 6:32 p.m.
          • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
            Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 6:57 p.m.
            • Win without hitting (smallest chance)
              Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 18 May 2010, at 7:35 p.m.
              • Win without hitting -- now officially OT
                Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 5:15 p.m.