BGonline.org Forums
Prime v. Prune
Posted By: Chase
Date: Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 12:05 p.m.
In Response To: Prime v. Prune (joe freedman)
It seemed important to escape the back checker
Advancing the back checker doesn't give you any more escaping numbers and gives you fewer partial escaping (coming out to the 18pt) numbers.
Messages In This Thread
- Prime v. Prune
joe freedman -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 5:08 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 8:26 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 9:39 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
joe freedman -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 10:29 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
Stick -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 11:06 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
joe freedman -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 11:13 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 11:24 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
joe freedman -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 11:53 a.m.
- Prime v. Prune
Chase -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 12:05 p.m.
- QF
Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 3:19 p.m.
- Prime v. Prune
Seth -- Saturday, 22 May 2010, at 11:51 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.