BGonline.org Forums

Rollout

Posted By: Stick
Date: Sunday, 6 June 2010, at 8:26 p.m.

In Response To: Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2 (Stick)

XG had this as a much bigger error on analysis, .04 or thereabouts if I remember correctly. Rollout brings it closer but still thinks it's wrong. My stubbornness disagrees and would still run if the same position were to come up tomorrow.

	is Ray score: 1 pip: 140 9 point match pip: 148 score: 0 is Stick
XGID=-a---CD-C---cCa-bb-d-bA-A-:0:0:1:63:0:1:0:9:10
to play 63

1.	Rollout1	8/2 5/2	eq: -0.332
	Player: Opponent: 41.45% (G:13.21% B:0.57%) 58.55% (G:17.58% B:1.03%) Conf: ± 0.007 (-0.339...-0.325) Duration: 3 hours 02 minutes
2.	Rollout1	24/15	eq: -0.348 (-0.015)
	Player: Opponent: 41.97% (G:10.89% B:0.61%) 58.03% (G:19.43% B:0.81%) Conf: ± 0.007 (-0.355...-0.341) Duration: 3 hours 41 minutes
1 10368 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 36438452 Moves and cube decisions: 3 ply

Messages In This Thread

• Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2
  Stick -- Saturday, 5 June 2010, at 5:01 p.m.
  • Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2
    Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 5 June 2010, at 5:29 p.m.
    • Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2
      christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 5 June 2010, at 8:25 p.m.
  • Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 5 June 2010, at 9:33 p.m.
  • Positions from Chicago Semis Match - Ray v. Stick #2
    John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 5 June 2010, at 11:04 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Sunday, 6 June 2010, at 8:26 p.m.
    • Rollout
      neilkaz -- Monday, 7 June 2010, at 6:47 p.m.