BGonline.org Forums

Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 10:07 p.m.

In Response To: Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf (Daniel Murphy)

These rollouts are interesting. I looked back at some of my old rollouts and discovered that they were 0-ply rollouts, done before I had learned what a big difference there was between 0-ply and 2-ply rollouts. So it seems that I drew some incorrect conclusions from them. Time for an update!

Messages In This Thread

• Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
  Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 1:42 p.m.
  • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
    Stick -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 1:45 p.m.
    • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
      Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:07 p.m.
      • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
        Stick -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:13 p.m.
        • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
          Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:28 p.m.
        • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
          Alejandro -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:35 p.m.
          • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
            Stick -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:39 p.m.
            • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
              Alejandro -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 2:48 p.m.
      • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf
        Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 10:07 p.m.
  • Ref-Spares-854-or-764-or-863-vs-2-on-bar-and-good-board.sgf - RO
    Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 5:21 p.m.