| |
BGonline.org Forums
Correct to double and correct to beaver
Posted By: Daniel Murphy In Response To: Correct to double and correct to beaver (Seth)
Date: Monday, 14 June 2010, at 7:58 p.m.
Not a drop, you think? I disagree. White has a clear drop. 50/50? No way. More like 90/10. White has gammon vig? No, played correctly, White wins nearly zero gammons. If White has "nice" gammon vig -- is winning a significant number of gammons -- that's a sign that Blue is not playing well.
Only a few trials, so far, I realize
Ah ... play more, with both sides playing well ;-
You don't say whether your opponents are human or not, but on the chance that you are playing White against a bot playing Blue, let me note that just now I played one game as Blue. Gnubg 2-ply gave me a Snowie-equivalent ER of 12.88, and Gnubg 3-ply gave me a Snowie ER of 22.12. Needless to say, they're wrong.
Just one silly bot play:
The score (after 0 games) is: White 0, Blue 0
Move number 35: Blue to play 41
White 31
Blue 205 Position ID: /z8AQAAA1rZtAA Match ID: QwkGAAAAAAAA
• Gnubg 2-ply and 3-ply would play 11/7 10/9
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.