| |
BGonline.org Forums
Fifth or sixth? Issue of terminology
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Fifth or sixth? Issue of terminology (mtuhtan)
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010, at 10:03 p.m.
"...[Matt's] sequence is not exactly right."
Shortest legal sequence is 31P-41S-44K-64<-C
Matt's best-play sequence is 41S-44K-54>31P-F-C
By that I assume you mean it's not the sequence that happened in the game.
Anyway, sorry about my obtuseness; I copied the sequence from Matt's post header without thinking. It should have occurred to me to look for alternate legal sequences (which are obvious). Then I would have asked you which of the possibilities actually occurred before raising the xth-roll topic.
I may as well point out that in your shorter sequence 31P-41S-44K-64<-C, the 44K play (24/16* 6/2*(2)) is an eval error (sez Snowie -.025 and Gnu -.001), and should (according to eval) be played as 44D (24/16* 13/9(2)). Reference diagram below. Matt's sequence 41S-44K-54>-31P-F-C (though one roll longer) is the shortest sequence which is clearly played properly for both sides.
That aside, I'm relieved that we (and evidently others) agree on the issue of terminology. This became a minor bone of contention for me years ago when someone I communicated with on a regular basis referred to 51S-66B-662-cub or 41S-55A-fan-cub, and such, as "third roll cube decisions" (i.e., situations that you and I call "fourth roll cube decisions").
31P-41S-44: Hitting twice is an (eval) error
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.