BGonline.org Forums

RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION

Posted By: Maik Stiebler
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010, at 12:51 p.m.

In Response To: RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION (Ray Kershaw)

Regarding (2), general pointers of a rather theoretical nature can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness_tests

More practically, the Diehard test and its successors seem to have been fairly widespread: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diehard_tests

Messages In This Thread

• RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
  Ray Kershaw -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 7:14 a.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 12:51 p.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Sam Pottle -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 4:37 p.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Jason Lee -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 4:56 p.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Frank Berger -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 9:48 p.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 21 June 2010, at 11:46 p.m.
  • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
    Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 22 June 2010, at 11:51 a.m.
    • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 22 June 2010, at 5:24 p.m.
      • RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION
        Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 22 June 2010, at 7:31 p.m.