| |
BGonline.org Forums
42P-64, data
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 42P-64, data (David Rockwell)
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010, at 10:57 p.m.
I've got GNU:
42P-63 [S R4.3] 46k
42P-63 s[R S22] 5kAssuming that these rollouts are not corrupt, I would expect that S & R would behave similarly for 42P-64 at GS. There should be a swing towards R. So, I don't see how 64S could be best.
Good comparison, David. Moreover, there are Gnu companions of
31P-63 [S R21] 15k and
31P-63 s[R S8.4] 15k53P-63 [S R21] 15k
53P-63 s[R S16] 5k64P-63 [S R14] 31k
64P-63 s[R S11] 10kBasically, S (Split, 24/18 13/10) is best for money and R (24/15, Run) is best at gammon save for all rollouts in this group.
I did not include 62 and 64 reply results because either they were all too lopsided to create a proper contrast or the emergence of P eliminated S and/or R from reasonable rollout contention (except for the corrupted results of 42P-64, the feature position in question).
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.