| |
BGonline.org Forums
Replies to opening 32Z
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Replies to opening 32Z (Sam Pottle)
Date: Saturday, 26 June 2010, at 6:58 p.m.
I would lay heavy odds that you would get the answer to 32Z-62 right (as long as you don't know I'm betting :)), but I have often seen people get the answer to 32Z-64 wrong.
32Z-64 is not a close decision like the others I listed (and therefore not a sensible candidate for rolling out on 4-ply), but perhaps I should have included it because it's where a 32Z player might pick up substantial equity. There are two or three alternatives to the best play that are conceptually justifiable.
Nack
32Z-64
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.