[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Replies to opening 32Z

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Saturday, 26 June 2010, at 6:58 p.m.

In Response To: Replies to opening 32Z (Sam Pottle)

I would lay heavy odds that you would get the answer to 32Z-62 right (as long as you don't know I'm betting :)), but I have often seen people get the answer to 32Z-64 wrong.

32Z-64 is not a close decision like the others I listed (and therefore not a sensible candidate for rolling out on 4-ply), but perhaps I should have included it because it's where a 32Z player might pick up substantial equity. There are two or three alternatives to the best play that are conceptually justifiable.

Nack


2O ' ' ' '5X '3X '1X '5O

1X '1X ' '5O '3O ' ' '4X

32Z-64


Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.