| |
BGonline.org Forums
Replies to opening 32Z
Posted By: Sam Pottle In Response To: Replies to opening 32Z (Nack Ballard)
Date: Saturday, 26 June 2010, at 9:06 p.m.
as long as you don't know I'm betting :)
Nack Factor, or NF.
Three alternatives (on 32Z-64)? Z seems unjustified, desu ne? I guess S, R, and P are all available; "I don't know what to do, so I'll shut my eyes and pretend it's the opening roll". But S looks too big, despite the 6-duplication, and I don't care to play behind White's split with P. That leaves R, which would be my second choice.
I really hope hitting is right.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.