| |
BGonline.org Forums
Replies to opening 32Z
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Replies to opening 32Z (Sam Pottle)
Date: Saturday, 26 June 2010, at 9:43 p.m.
Three alternatives (on 32Z-64)? Z seems unjustified, desu ne? I guess S, R, and P are all available; "I don't know what to do, so I'll shut my eyes and pretend it's the opening roll". But S looks too big, despite the 6-duplication, and I don't care to play behind White's split with P. That leaves R, which would be my second choice.
32Z-64 [H R32 S40 P63]
I really hope hitting is right.
Your prayers have been answered. I have two rollouts; both are 5k and the first isn't even with a live cube, but it's good nuf for guvmint work.
Snowie .. [H R38 S49 P66] 5k
GnuBG .. [H R26 S32 P60] 5kKey: H = Hit (13/3*), R = Run (24/14), S = Split (24/18 13/9), P = Point (8/2 6/2), Z = reverse split (24/20 13/7). Error sizes are in thousandths. Number of trials ("k") is in thousands, rounded down. For example, [H R26...] 5k means that H is best, R is -.026, etc., after 5000+ trials.
It is instructive that for 32Z-64, P is fourth best and a blunder compared to H. Though it is "only" .031 behind R and .023 behind S, compare with 43S-64, which is diagrammed below and only two pips different, where (by bot aggregate) P is best and edges out R by .007 and S by .024.
43S-64 [P R7 S24]
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.