| |
BGonline.org Forums
Replies to opening 32Z
Posted By: David Rockwell In Response To: Replies to opening 32Z (Nack Ballard)
Date: Sunday, 27 June 2010, at 4:08 a.m.
There are some opening game whores who DO waste their time memorizing and learning things they are never going to see. Some even waste their time on ATS replies for these openings. 32Z replies:
21 - the tempo hit is needed since opener has many strong point making numbers
32 - kill (double hit) and I don't understand this even though I went through the whole 36ing exercise and Nack explained it here once.
41 - I would play up although split and hit were so close the rollouts could have changed by now. There's no good place to use that four.
43 - hit and split because of the blot on the 10 point
51 - split - I seem to recall that running was close and we all know now that one is inclined to stop on the bar when the blot is on the 10. Nevertheless, I prefer the simple splitting play.
52 - I would split although I know that kill (double hit) was very close in the rollout. The tempo is needed here just as it is with 21, but I hate to use the spare on the eight for the task.
65 - trick question? I run despite the advice we've been receiving about stoping on the bar when the blot is on the 10. I am only aware of one opening roll which doesn't require 65R as a money response and that's 43U.
I play 32Z just for fun every once in a while. The problem with it is that even though few players know how to respond, so many rolls have multiple reasonable choices which are very close. There's no real hope of getting the gambit equity back even with gifts like 64R which I received the last time I gave it a try. And, those four outfield shots are killers.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.