BGonline.org Forums

32D - 51S?

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Friday, 9 July 2010, at 3:14 p.m.

In Response To: 32D - 51S - 41? (christian munk-christensen)

That's a shocker. GNU rollouts show slotting correct at all scores. I guess it could be close enough that splitting is reasonable considering GNU's slotting bias.

Here's the GNU data I have. The ATS rollouts are brief which may be the problem.

32D-51

m[$ S9.8] - 31k

d[$ S5.5 R14] - 5k

g[$ S27] - 5k

s[$ S13] - 6k

Messages In This Thread

• 32D - 51S - 41?
  christian munk-christensen -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 8:44 a.m.
  • 32D - 51S - 41?
    Paul Weaver -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 11:54 a.m.
    • 32D - 51S - 41?
      christian munk-christensen -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 2:35 p.m.
      • 32D - 51S - 41?
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 2:39 p.m.
      • 32D - 51S?
        David Rockwell -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 3:14 p.m.
        • 32D - 51, money data
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 10 July 2010, at 2:09 a.m.
          • 32D - 51, money data
            neilkaz -- Saturday, 10 July 2010, at 2:14 a.m.
            • 32D - 51, money data
              Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 10 July 2010, at 2:31 a.m.
              • 32D - 51 XG 4 ply RO starting now for money *NM*
                neilkaz -- Saturday, 10 July 2010, at 1:05 p.m.
      • 32D - 51S - 41?
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 9 July 2010, at 10:54 p.m.
  • 32D-51S-41?
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 10 July 2010, at 2:51 a.m.