BGonline.org Forums

simple little bearin

Posted By: Christian Munk-Christensen
Date: Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 6:18 a.m.

In Response To: simple little bearin (neilkaz)

OtB I never considered anything else than 10/5. When XG+ told me how bad this play is, I looked and found 64 as a bad number.

To me the big question is how do you convince yourself OtB that avoiding 64 is reason enough to remove a stepping stone in a play that leaves a presumably smooth position with spares on most points?

I don't think I would ever look so far ahead as Paul did in his reply and see the double blotting numbers.

Messages In This Thread

• simple little bearin
  christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 13 July 2010, at 8:39 p.m.
  • simple little bearin
    Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 13 July 2010, at 9:53 p.m.
  • simple little bearin
    Paul Weaver -- Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 12:18 a.m.
  • simple little bearin
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 2:18 a.m.
  • simple little bearin
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 3:09 a.m.
    • simple little bearin
      Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 6:18 a.m.
      • simple little bearin
        Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 14 July 2010, at 4:15 p.m.