BGonline.org Forums

54D-32, two GnuBG rollouts

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Friday, 16 July 2010, at 12:55 a.m.

In Response To: 54D-32, two GnuBG rollouts (David Rockwell)

Considering everything you have posted, I wonder if there is corruption in the rollout where the slotting plays look best.

Yes, that's possible. From my notes, it appears that Stick assigned that file out (as opposed to having rolled it himself). However, (a) it was done with version 0.90-mingw. And (b) the absolute equity clusters are not terribly far apart: -.1603, -.1691, -.1734, -.1822 and -.1830 in one file, and -.1724, -.1626, -.1627, -.1948, and -.1682 in the other. Both (a) and (b) reduce the chance that the file is corrupted. That said, I agree that the result looks pretty fishy.

In case you have any interest in rerolling it, the details (seed 857688062, number of trials for each play, etc.) are in the file output I posted.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 54D-32 question for Nack
  neilkaz -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 3:50 p.m.
  • 54D-32 question for Nack
    David Rockwell -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 4:48 p.m.
  • 54D-32 question for Nack
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 5:40 p.m.
    • 54D-32, two GnuBG rollouts
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 5:59 p.m.
      • 54D-32, two Snowie rollouts (look at *live cube equities)
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 6:18 p.m.
        • 54D-32, two Snowie rollouts (look at *live cube equities)
          neilkaz -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 7:09 p.m.
          • 54D-32, two Snowie rollouts (look at *live cube equities)
            Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 7:20 p.m.
      • 54D-32, two GnuBG rollouts
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 15 July 2010, at 8:27 p.m.
        • 54D-32, two GnuBG rollouts
          Nack Ballard -- Friday, 16 July 2010, at 12:55 a.m.