BGonline.org Forums

I'm referring to GG

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 8:45 p.m.

In Response To: 61P-54 RO at GS is quite clear (neilkaz)

D being a candidate here comes as a surprise to me, but I will try it later, once my RO of this position at GG finishes (unclear between S and D after 5k)

Sorry for the confusion. When you said, "Now a look at this play at GG," here, I assumed that the accompanying rollout was GG (without checking the header or score). It also would have helped if I had changed my header and/or spelled out "GG" in my response (even though it was redundant from my perspective).

To be clear, you were not referring to the rollout immediately below your comment. (Indeed, you weren't here either, though that time I thought to check the header and score.) Perhaps it would be less confusing if you inserted such a comment after the diagram, though now that I'm alerted to the modus operandi I'll be careful not to misinterpret again.

To be clear, it would be wasteful to add D (which is around -.040) to the GS rollout. It might be worthwhile to add R (probably -.017 or so) to the GG rollout (for which you already have S and D), though I understand if you don't want to spend your 4-ply CPU that way.

Thanks.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 61P-54 RO at DMP
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 21 July 2010, at 12:19 p.m.
  • 61P-54 RO at DMP
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 21 July 2010, at 6:47 p.m.
  • 61P-54 RO at GS is quite clear
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 1:06 a.m.
    • 61P-54 RO at GS is quite clear
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 7:14 a.m.
      • 61P-54 RO at GS is quite clear
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 2:19 p.m.
        • I'm referring to GG
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 8:45 p.m.
          • Now that makes more sense
            neilkaz -- Friday, 23 July 2010, at 4:10 a.m.