BGonline.org Forums

Inconceivable!

Posted By: happyjuggler0
Date: Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 8:12 p.m.

In Response To: 61P-54 RO at GG (neilkaz)

Well, it is clear if both players play as well as the bot does. But with only a 0.006 difference, +/-0.002, then it is not inconceivable that the practical best play might be splitting.

As an example from a different opening, 52 at $ is mildly better with splitting than coming down if memory serves, but if you think your opponent will misplay 21 41 and 51 in response then you don't want to split.

Whether anything like that is going on here or not I don't know, but it is food for thought.

Messages In This Thread

• 61P-54 RO at GG
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 3:55 p.m.
  • 61P-54 RO at GG
    christian munk-christensen -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 4:10 p.m.
    • 61P-54 RO at GG
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 4:36 p.m.
      • 61P-54 RO at GG
        mtuhtan -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 4:48 p.m.
        • 61P-54 RO at GG
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 5:00 p.m.
          • Inconceivable!
            happyjuggler0 -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 8:12 p.m.
            • Inconceivable!
              Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 25 July 2010, at 2:05 a.m.
              • Inconceivable!
                happyjuggler0 -- Sunday, 25 July 2010, at 4:02 a.m.
                • Inconceivable!
                  Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 1:16 a.m.
      • roflol *NM*
        sonrik -- Monday, 26 July 2010, at 1:41 a.m.