BGonline.org Forums

xxP-54, progression of R, S, D

Posted By: Perry Gartner
Date: Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 8:55 p.m.

In Response To: xxP-54, progression of R, S, D (Nack Ballard)

From the perspective of responding to your opponents game plan(GP): 1.Making the 2 tends towards attacking, so a priming GP and not splitting is best.

2. Making the 4 or bar leads to a priming GP so splitting attempts to thwart the prime.

3. Making the 3 seems to lead to more attacking than priming so the results, althugh close are still counter to the theory. However I wonder if at match scores equal to money, 0-0 to 7 for example, the gammons on one wouldn't reverse the result? Or is the premise of the 3 point tending towards an attacking GP overstated? How would you explain it and did I convince someone to do a rollout?

Perry

Messages In This Thread

• 53P-54 3 ply
  David Rockwell -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 3:50 p.m.
  • xxP-54, progression of R, S, D
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 10:11 p.m.
    • xxP-54, progression of R, S, D
      Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 22 July 2010, at 10:48 p.m.
    • xxP-54, progression of R, S, D
      Perry Gartner -- Saturday, 24 July 2010, at 8:55 p.m.
      • xxP-54, progression of R, S, D
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 25 July 2010, at 12:24 a.m.